An SMSF can potentially invest in a joint venture (JV) property development, but the criteria are necessarily strict and there are a range
of issues that need to be considered carefully. One of the issues that needs to be considered up-front is determining the substance of the
arrangement between the parties, because the term JV can be used to describe a variety of arrangements. The ATO confirms that care must be
taken to ensure that arrangements with related parties are true JVs.
Under a JV, the SMSF invests in and has a share of the property being developed (not the entity undertaking the development). Each party
bears the costs (time and/or money) of the JV and receives this same proportionate contribution from the returns. If the arrangement is not
structured properly then the SMSF’s stake in the JV could be treated as an investment in or loan to a related party and be treated as an
in-house asset. For example, this could be the case if the SMSF only provides a capital outlay for the arrangement and has no rights other
than a contractual right to a return on the final investment.
It is also necessary to consider whether the arrangement between the parties could be treated as a partnership for tax, GST and legal
purposes. For example, this could be the case if the arrangement involves the sharing of income, sale proceeds or profits, rather than
sharing the output from the project.